Britain’s investment minister warned on Tuesday that a U.S. firm is attempting to buy Aviva investors’ shares at a price well below market value, raising concerns about the protection of retail shareholders.
Government and regulator respond to alleged mini‑tender offer
Lord Stockwood said the government will cooperate with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to ensure investors are “protected” after a report revealed that US‑based Litani had sent letters to roughly 100,000 Aviva retail shareholders proposing to purchase their stock for 530p per share. That price is noticeably lower than the 657p closing price recorded the previous day.
The FCA chief, Nikhil Rathi, faced questions from MPs about the same offer, which insiders in the City have labeled a “scam.” The proposal targets a segment of Aviva’s 500,000‑strong shareholder base that originally received shares when Norwich Union demutualised. The company has issued a warning to these investors, urging them not to accept the low‑ball offer.
Ros Altmann, a former pensions minister, raised the issue in the House of Lords, asking what steps the government is taking to shield shareholders of large British companies from “mini‑tender offers” that aim to buy shares from vulnerable owners at below‑market rates. Stockwood replied that the law requires communications about buying and selling shares to be “fair, clear and not misleading,” and that the FCA will continue to monitor the situation.
He added that while an under‑market price can sometimes be justified when a stock lacks liquidity, each case must be examined to ensure no wrongdoing has occurred. He expressed confidence that the regulator has the appropriate processes to investigate such matters.
Related: Imports up €2bn in May as exports slip
Broader implications for other UK firms
The potential targeting of Aviva shareholders has sparked worries that similar tactics could be used against other companies with large public ownership bases, such as Centrica, the parent of British Gas, and telecoms group BT. Both firms have historically maintained extensive retail shareholder registers, making them attractive candidates for unsolicited offers.
During a Treasury select committee hearing, former Treasury minister John Glen pressed FCA chief Rathi on the issue. He emphasized that any communication sent to shareholders must meet fairness standards, and the regulator will keep a close watch on the matter.
Aviva’s chief executive, Amanda Blanc, reiterated the company’s stance in a Bloomberg interview, stating that the firm is actively warning investors about the unsolicited proposal and urging them to seek professional advice before making any decisions.
In practice, the FCA’s role includes overseeing the conduct of firms that make such offers and ensuring that any promotional material complies with existing consumer‑protection rules. The regulator has previously taken action against firms that used misleading language or failed to disclose key terms in share‑purchase proposals.
Given the scale of the alleged scheme, the FCA may consider broader measures, such as tightening guidance on mini‑tender offers or enhancing monitoring of cross‑border solicitations. Any regulatory changes would aim to balance the need for a healthy retail‑investment market with the imperative to protect individual investors from predatory tactics.
Related: Canada posts $4.2B trade surplus in May
The situation illustrates how quickly a targeted approach can affect a large pool of small shareholders. While the immediate focus is on the Litani offer, the episode could prompt a reassessment of how UK firms communicate with their retail base and how regulators enforce compliance.
From a cautious standpoint, if the FCA confirms that the Litani letters breached disclosure rules, we might see increased scrutiny of similar outreach from foreign entities. This could lead to stricter enforcement actions and possibly new guidance for firms that wish to engage directly with UK shareholders.
For now, Aviva continues to advise its investors to verify any unsolicited proposals through official channels and to consider the market price before agreeing to any transaction. The company’s communication highlights the importance of due diligence, especially when offers appear substantially lower than recent trading levels.
Investors should remain vigilant.
Leave a Reply